Under Proper Circumstances, A Stay Of The Action, Or An Arbitrable, Severable Issue, Would Have Been Mandatory.

        Ann Leenay brought a PAGA action for various Labor Code violations against her former employer, Lowe's Home Centers, LLC. The trial court consolidated her action with five other actions. Lowe's moved to stay the six consolidated actions based on 50 pending arbitrations with overlapping issues. The trial court stayed the litigation, and Leenay sought a writ of mandate to undo that court's stay order.  Ann Leenay, petitioner, v. Superior Ct. of San Bernardino Cty., Lowe's Home Centers, respondent and real party in interest, E077292 (4/2  7/22/22) (Menetrez, Ramirez, Slough).

        The key fact, which led to the granting of the writ of mandate petition, was that neither Ann Leenay, nor the other five plaintiffs, were parties to the 50 pending arbitrations.  The statutory provision authorizing a stay of litigation based on pending arbitration is Cal. Code of Civ. Proc., § 1281.3. Justice Menetrez explained: "Section 1281.4 does not authorize the court to stay a plaintiff’s action on the basis of a pending arbitration to which the plaintiff is not a party.