Panel Denies Motion For Rehearing And Request For En Banc.
On September 15, 2021, we posted about Hodges v. Comcast, No. 19-16483 (9th Cir. 9/10/21) (Collins, VanDyke; Berzon, dsst.) In that case, the court held that non-waivable public injunctive relief (i.e., relief that falls under the McGill rule), must be forward looking and benefit the general public. Judge Berzon dissented, believing that relief that would require Comcast to rewrite its contract with its customers would be forward looking and benefit the public, given the size of Comcast's customer base. On December 23, 2021, the panel denied a petition for a rehearing, and denied on behalf of the court a petition for a rehearing en banc.
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.